I'm reminded of the first year lecture in logic that discussed necessary and sufficient conditions. Adapting the basic idea to my argument: -
'Talent' is a necessary condition for success in this field but it certainly isn't sufficient on its own; you also need 'dogged determination'The reverse statement is equally true: -
'Dogged determination' is a necessary condition for success in this field but it certainly isn't sufficient on its own; you also need 'talent'Every successful person I know would understand this instinctively. My quarrel is with those who argue that 'luck' is a necessary condition for success. How can you genuinely pursue a goal if you have a heartfelt belief that success will require some entirely random, external event to occur some time in the future?